Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37917303

RESUMO

Recognizing the variety of borders that gather and divide our world, such as geographical, temporal, social and psychological, the study highlights that the transit across these borders drives changes and continuities that contribute to human development. The research emphasizes the relevance of reviewing both the individual singularities and the shared aspects of border crossing experiences. The matching of these approaches allows building theoretical models referring to those experiences. Thus, this article aims to review borders crossing as a developmental and abductively generalizable process. Through the analogy between Abductive Generalization and photogrammetry, the study proposes an innovative way of representing these complex experiences. Three ways of border crossing - spatial displacement, imagination and social interactions - are explored in terms of their developmental potential. Using a case study of psychologists in a humanitarian non-governmental organization - NGO, an abductively generalized model is presented highlighting the spatial, cultural and psychological dimensions involved. In addition, the study proposes a three-dimensional helical model of development inspired by photogrammetry, incorporating principles of this technique to improve the understanding on the border crossing process. By recognizing mesogenetic influences, such as institutional and cultural dimensions, the article puts forward an interdisciplinary approach to understand development through border crossing. The models presented may potentially drive future research and interventions in Semiotic Cultural Psychology, enriching the promotion of human development in different border contexts. The study fosters the extension of this work by including several perspectives, methods and paradigms.

2.
Rev. para. med ; 28(1)jan.-mar. 2014. ilus
Artigo em Português | LILACS-Express | LILACS | ID: lil-712231

RESUMO

Objetivo: Avaliar o perfil de utilização dos antimicrobianos prescritos naAla cirúrgica do serviço de otorrinolaringologia de um Hospital Universitário. Método: Consisteem um estudoobservacional, transversal e retrospectivo de prescrições de antimicrobianos aos pacientes atendidos em um Hospital Universitário de Belém/PA, realizado em 2012. Resultados: As classes da cefalosporinas foram as mais prescritas, tendo como as mais representativas as cefalotinas (77,54%) e ceftriaxona (4,32%). A mastoidectomia foi o procedimento que mais utilizou diferentes classes de antibióticos em formas farmacêuticas das mais variadas (colírio, suspensão, solução otológica e comprimido revestido). Destaca-se que apenas 0,91% dos prontuários tinham solicitação de cultura. A grande maioria (99,09%) dos prontuários não havia registro de exames microbiológicos, caracterizando que o tratamento foi realizado de maneira empírica. Conclusão:A utilização de antibioticoterapia profilática em cirurgias otorrinolaringológicas continua sendo realizada de forma empírica, em especial com uso de cefalosporina de primeira e terceira geração não preconizados na literatura, podendo ocorrer resistência.


Objective: This study aims to evaluate the profile of use of antimicrobials prescribed in the surgical wing of otorhino-laryngology of a University Hospital. Method: consists of an observational, cross-sectional and retrospective study of antimicrobial prescriptions for patients seen at the University Hospital, carried out in 2012 Results: classes of cephalosporins were the most prescribed and as the most representative cefalotinas (75.71%) and ceftriaxone (5.00%). a mastoidectomy was the procedure that most used classes of antibiotics and dosage forms of various (eye drops, suspension, ear solution and tablet). An important factor stressed that only 0.91% of the records request had culture. The vast majority (99.09%) of the port there was no record of microbiological tests, characterizing the treatment was carried out empirically. Conclusion: in summary, the use of antibiotic prophylaxis in otorhinolaryngology surgeries still performed empirically, in particular with the use of cephalosporin first and third generation not recommended in

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA